Events that may impact FX mortgage leagal risk and related provision

The Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court has been requested for answering the questions concerning key matters related to FX mortgage agreements: (i) is it permissible to replace – with the law provisions or with a custom – the abusive provisions of an agreement which refer to FX exchange rate determination; moreover, (ii) in case of impossibility of determining the exchange rate of a foreign currency in the indexed/denominated credit agreement – is it permissible to keep the agreement still valid in its remaining scope; as well as (iii) if in case of invalidity of the CHF credit there would be applicable the theory of balance (i.e. does arise a single claim which is equal to the difference between value of claims of bank and the customer) or the theory of two condictions (separate claims for the bank and for the client that should be dealt with separately). The Supreme Court has also been requested for answering the question on (iv) from which point in time there shall be starting the limitation period in case of bank’s claim for repayment of amounts paid as a loan and (v) whether banks and consumers may receive remuneration for using their pecuniary means by another party.

On 11 May the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court requested opinions on Swiss franc mortgage loans from five institutions including the National Bank of Poland (NBP), the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (UKNF), the Commissioner for Human Rights, the Children’s Rights Ombudsman and the Financial Ombudsman.

The positions of: the Commissioner for Human Rights, the Children’s Rights Ombudsman and the Financial Ombudsman are in general favorable to consumers, while the National Bank of Poland and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority present a more balanced position, including fair principles of treatment of FX mortgage borrowers vis-à-vis PLN mortgage borrowers, as well as balanced economic aspects regarding solutions for the problem that could be considered by the Supreme Court.

In the next meeting of the Supreme Court that took place on 2 September 2021, the Court did not address the answers to the submitted questions and no new meeting date is known. The Bank will assess in due time the implications of the decisions of the Supreme Court on the level of provisions for the legal risk.

In August 2021, the CJEU was asked for a preliminary ruling (C-520/21) whether, in the event that a loan agreement concluded by a bank and a consumer is deemed invalid from the beginning due to unfair contract terms, the parties, in addition to the reimbursement of the money paid in contracts (bank – loan capital, consumer – installments, fees, commissions and insurance premiums) and statutory interest for delay from the moment of calling for payment, may also claim any other benefits, including receivables in particular, remuneration, compensation, reimbursement of costs or valorization of the performance.

Notwithstanding the above there are a number of questions addressed by polish courts to the European Court of Justice which may be relevant for the outcome of the court disputes in Poland.

The subject matter questions relate, in particular, to:

• the possibility of replacing of an abusive contractual clause with a dispositive law provision;
• the limitation period of a consumer claims concerning reimbursement of benefits made as performance of an agreement which has been declared to be invalid
• the possibility of declaration by the Court of abusiveness of only part of a contractual provision.

With the scope of settlements between the Bank and borrower following the fall of the loan agreement is also connected the legal issue directed to the seven-person composition of the Supreme Court (case sign: III CZP 54/21). The date of case review has not been specified yet.

The Supreme Court was also presented with the issue of whether the loan agreement is a mutual agreement in the light of the regulations concerning retention right.

On December 8, 2020, Mr. Jacek Jastrzębski, the Chairman of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (‘PFSA’) proposed a ‘sector’ solution to address the sector risks related to FX mortgages. The solution would consist in offering by banks to their clients a voluntary possibility of concluding arrangements based on which a client would conclude with the bank a settlement as if his/her loan from the very beginning had been a PLN loan bearing interest at an appropriate WIBOR rate increased by the margin historically employed for such loan.

Following that public announcement, the idea has been subject of consultations between banks under the auspices of the PFSA and Polish Banking Association. Banks in general have been assessing the conditions under which such solution could be implemented and consequent impacts.

As expressed in our previous financial reports, in the view of the Management Board of the Bank, important aspects to take into consideration when deciding on potential implementation of such program are : a) favourable opinion or at least non-objection from important public institutions; b) support from National Bank of Poland to the implementation; c) level of legal certainty of the settlement agreements to be signed with the borrowers; d) level of the financial impact on a pre- and after tax basis; e) capital consequences including regulatory adjustments in the level of capital requirements associated with FX mortgage loans.

Based on current information some of the above mentioned aspects are not likely to be fully clarified and / or achieved.

At the time of publishing this report, neither the Management Board nor any other corporate body of the Bank took any decision regarding implementation of such program. If / when a recommendation regarding the program would be ready, the Management Board would submit it to the Supervisory Board and General Shareholders meeting taking into consideration the relevance of such decision and its implications.

Bank Millennium conducted a survey among its customers in cooperation with an external reputed company regarding the willingness to accept settlement in the terms of the sector solution put forward by the Chairman of KNF. 49% of clients enquired were preliminarily interested in benefitting from the proposal, while 25% were not able to clearly express their opinion and 26% would not take such offer.

According to the current calculations, implementation of a solution whereby loans would be voluntarily converted to Polish zloty as if from the very beginning they had been a PLN loan bearing interest at an appropriate WIBOR rate increased by the margin historically employed for such loans, could imply provisions for the losses resulting from conversion of such loans (if all the existing portfolio would be converted) with a pre-tax impact between PLN 4,390 million to PLN 4,848 million (not audited data). The impacts can significantly change in case of variation of the exchange rate and several assumptions. Impacts on capital could be partially absorbed and mitigated by the combination of the existing surplus of capital over the current minimum requirements, the reduction of risk weighted assets and the decrease or elimination of Pillar 2 buffer.

Due to the complexity and uncertainty regarding the outcome of court cases, as well as from potential implementation of KNF Chairman solution or from potential Supreme Court decisions or European Court of Justice decisions, it is difficult to reliably estimate potential impacts of such different outcomes and their interaction as at the date of publication of the financial statements.